About Veterinary Prescriber

Veterinary Prescriber was founded in 2012 by Andrea Tarr, a pharmacist with a long career in independent medicines information, who recognised the need for impartial, evidence-based, comparative and practical information to support veterinary practitioners in the rational treatment of animals. 

Veterinary Prescriber is published by an independent company, Mixolydian Publications Limited. It accepts no sponsorship or advertising, is free to discuss all medicines and to be critical of evidence and promotion.

How We Produce The Information

  1. We develop a module outline that identifies the questions that need answering.

  2. We search for the relevant published information, using the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons (RCVS) Knowledge Discovery Service (including PubMed) and CAB abstracts, to maximise journal coverage and ensure we include all the available published evidence (Grindlay et al 2012)

  3. We commission a collaborating author to write the text based on the outline.

The draft is circulated to a wide range of reviewers, including topic specialists, general practice vets, pharmaceutical companies, regulatory bodies. The role of commentators is to:

  1. raise points about interpretation of evidence.

  2. raise questions important to practitioners.

  3. give personal insights from having used treatments.

Draft modules are edited by Veterinary Prescriber editors, who are highly skilled in critical appraisal and integrating clinical evidence with practical information. We aim to make a clear distinction between evidence and opinion; all of our modules are fully referenced, and we only refer to published sources as this allows anyone to examine the evidence for themselves.

Finally, the modules undergo rigorous checks. Modules are written in a simple succinct style and are also recorded as podcasts.

What makes our reviews special?

 
The Veterinary Prescriber logo at the centre of the different resources resources on veterinary medicines with the words making sense of medicines
 

Information about medicines comes from various sources. We integrate information from these diverse sources, including authorised product literature, regulatory authority reports, formulary recommendations and clinical opinion. And we scrutinise promotional claims - in our medicines reviews and in the monthly Medicines News feature, ADVET - what the adverts say and what they’re not telling you! We do this to help veterinary professional make rational decisions that are not influenced by vested interests.

 
 

More about Veterinary Prescriber: Our Philosophy

The key to prescribing excellence is independence.

Why?

Medicines need to be used rationally. This is because as well as benefits, they can cause harm to the animals they are used to treat, to the people handling them and to the environment. 

But it's hard to find information that gives veterinary professionals the full facts about the harms as well as the benefits, and how different treatment options compare, which is crucial for making decisions in the best interests of animals and their owners rather than pharmaceutical companies and their shareholders.

Vets are not as well served as doctors in having access to a wide range of high-quality prescribing information so they don't have what they need to balance out the weight of promotion.

Companies are great at talking about the benefits of their products but they don't like them to be compared with alternatives and they don't want to draw attention to any disadvantages.

Keeping up-to-date on medicines is as important as having good prescribing information but it's also hard to find CPD resources on medicines that are not directly from, or sponsored by, the pharmaceutical industry.

Our purpose

Our purpose is to provide veterinary professionals with high-quality, independent, comparative information they won't find elsewhere. We are absolutely passionate about independent information and empowering veterinary professionals by giving them what they need to make rational decisions about medicines.

We are an independent, self-funded company. Our business model isn’t based on adverts or sponsorship. As a subscription-based service, our customers are the people who want our information. We don't court advertisers or sponsors and wouldn't want to anyway because that would compromise our independence and trustworthiness.

A happy side effect of this is that there are no adverts, banners or pop-ups to distract subscribers from our high-quality content and CPD.

 
 

Editorial Team

Veterinary Prescriber’s editorial team has a long and distinguished experience of producing independent information and advice on medicines. They have particular skills in searching for and critically appraising evidence, making sense of the evidence by integrating it with opinion and practical information, and writing clearly and accurately about medicines.

 
 
 
 

Veterinary Consultants

Our veterinary consultants help identify the topics to review, help define the scope of the reviews, suggest specialist commentators, and comment regularly on drafts, to ensure that the information and advice is relevant to veterinary practice.

 

 Collaborating authors

Our modules begin with a detailed outline and a systematic search for evidence. We use the outline and search results to commission a collaborating author to write the first draft. Collaborating authors are specialists in the module topic or in medicines evaluation. The following are authors who have collaborated with us and through doing so have read the evidence, summarised it in the context of clinical practice and helped to clarify the messages in the module through their responses to commentators and editors.

 

Daniela Alder

Helen Barnett

Hazel Bentall

Nicola Bates

Colin Capner

Filippo de Bellis

Gwen Covey-Crump

Gillian Diesel

Debbie Guest

Matt Gurney

Grant Hayes

Julian Kupfer

Valerie Lamb

Helen Matthews

Emily Newson-Davies

Spela Oberstar

James Oliver

Jacoby Patterson

Luke Richardson

Kathryn Wareham

Ian Wright

 Helping to improve the use of veterinary medicines

Veterinary Prescriber aims to provide independent information on medicines to enable veterinary professionals to make informed and unbiased choices to help animals get the best care.

The work we do to produce the reviews that we publish as CPD modules involves scrutiny of the evidence and official information on medicines. Sometimes we come across things that seem to make it difficult to make the best use of medicines and do our best to draw attention to these, so that changes can follow. Below are some examples.

 

  • Highlighted anomalous statements in the SPC for Pardale-V (paracetamol plus codeine) tablets, describing it as a NSAID and listing contraindications typical of a NSAID. The availability without a prerscription of 500-tablet packs, in contradiction to the law affecting human parcetamol. 

  • Drew attention to the dosing recommendations in the SPC of a brand of metronidazole that could lead to toxicity. CPD module on metronidazole toxicity.

  • Called for better quality information for pet owners in package leaflets. 

  • Criticised promotion tactics of pharmaceutical and supplement companies.

  • Highlighted the potential for safety problems with transdermal thiamazole.

  • Publicised the need to be alert to the potential for safe handling of medicines in pregnancy